A private-sector proposal endorsed by U.S. President Donald Trump to build a railway from Canada's oil sands to ports in Alaska would free landlocked crude but faces numerous steep challenges.
Trump wrote on Twitter over the weekend that he would issue a permit for the Alaska-Alberta Railway Development Corporation (A2A Rail) project to move Alberta crude 1,600 miles (2,570 km) to the Alaskan coast, as well as freight in the other direction.
"I will be issuing a Presidential Permit for the A2A Cross-Border rail," Trump said. He said his decision was based on the recommendation of fellow Republicans Dan Sullivan, a U.S. senator, and Don Young, a U.S. representative. Projects that cross the U.S. border require presidential permits.
The $17 billion project, which backers hope will be in service by the end of the decade, was first proposed in 2015 by Canadian infrastructure financier Sean McCoshen.
It could carry up to 2 million bbl/d of oil, along with potash, sulphur and grain that often back up at Canada's Vancouver port, said Mead Treadwell, A2A's vice-chair, Alaska.
"The diversity of commodities helps reduce the risk," he said.
The case for A2A has involved often-congested pipelines that move Alberta crude to U.S refineries. However, new pipelines are now under construction.
Options to move crude from Canada, the world's fourth-largest producer, are useful, but A2A is "a very challenged project," said Dennis McConaghy, a former pipeline executive at TransCanada Corp., now known as TC Energy Corp.
Transportation costs to reach Asian or U.S. Gulf Coast refiners would be substantially higher than those involving pipelines, he added.
"This project makes sense if it’s absolutely the last resort," McConaghy said.
A2A would require numerous regulatory clearances in the United States and Canada that would likely take years. Discussions with shippers have not yet happened in depth, Treadwell said. He added that A2A would offer indigenous groups in the area a chance to invest.
Shipping oil by rail has caused several high-profile accidents in both Canada and the U.S. in recent years.
"At a time when California is banning gas-powered cars and China is pledging to transition off fossil fuels, it’s hard to imagine a bigger waste of money than building a rail line to move oil trains over the melting permafrost," said Keith Stewart, senior energy strategist at Greenpeace Canada.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment on how soon Trump would issue the permit.
Such a rail link "has been a dream for many generations," said Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy in a statement. Funded privately, it would reduce Alaska's costs of goods and services, he said.
Alberta supports A2A as it would unlock new markets for the province's exports, said Kavi Bal, senior press secretary for its energy ministry.
Recommended Reading
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (March 4, 2024)
2024-03-04 - For the upcoming week, Stratas Advisors expect the price of Brent will move sideways and will struggle to break through $85.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (April 29, 2024)
2024-04-29 - Stratas Advisors says even with the reported drawdown in U.S. crude inventories, the price of Brent crude oil remains below the upward channel that had been in place since January of this year.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (March 11, 2024)
2024-03-11 - Stratas Advisors expects oil prices to move higher in the middle of the year, but for the upcoming week, there is no impetus for prices to raise.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (May 6, 2024)
2024-05-06 - Stratas Advisors forecast that oil demand for 2024 will increase by 1.41 MMbbl/d in comparison to 2023 and that oil demand will increase by 810,000 bbl/d in comparison to 2Q23.
What's Affecting Oil Prices This Week? (March 25, 2024)
2024-03-25 - On average, Stratas Advisors are forecasting that oil supply will be at a deficit of 840,000 bbl/d in 2024.