Shareholders in Norway’s largest company, Statoil ASA (NYSE: STO), will approve on May 15 the board’s proposal to change its name as the company seeks to diversify its business and attract young talent concerned about fossil fuels’ impact on climate change.
From May 16, the majority state-owned company will change its 46-year-old name to Equinor and trade on the Oslo Exchange under the new ticker EQNR.
The Norwegian government, which has a 67% stake in the firm, has said it will back the move.
The oil and gas company said the name change was a natural step after it decided last year to become a “broad energy” firm, investing up to 15% to 20% of annual capex in “new energy solutions” by 2030, mostly in offshore wind.
“The key reason for a company to change its name is when it wants to widen the scope of its activity or direction. Another reason would be because it is in trouble, and it has a reputational problem,” Allyson Stewart-Allen, a London-based international branding expert and the CEO of International Marketing Partners, told Reuters. “I don’t believe that’s the case with Statoil.”
While the company’s profits are growing again, its hydrocarbon business has come under increased scrutiny after the Paris climate deal in 2016.
“A name with ‘oil’ as a component would increasingly be a disadvantage. None of our competitors has that. It served us really well for 50 years. I don’t think it will be the best name for the next 50 years,” Statoil CEO Eldar Saetre told Reuters.
The new name was meant to arouse curiosity among young people so they see the other aspects of Statoil, including renewable energy, he added.
Technology students became less interested in working for oil firms after oil prices crashed in 2014 and renewable energy gained in prominence.
Statoil ranked 15th in an annual survey of the Nordic country's most attractive employers conducted by karrierestart.no, a Norwegian careers website, and Norwegian firm Evidente, published on May 3. In 2013, it ranked first.
There are signs, however, that the name change could help it climb the ranks.
“Students who answered the survey after [news of] the name change found Statoil to be between 5% and 10% more attractive as an employer,” Arne Kvalsvik at Evidente said. “It’s likely that Statoil’s name change will have a positive impact on its reputation going forward.”
Statoil said it remained the first choice among technology students, citing another survey by Swedish firm Universum.
Truls Gulowsen, head of Greenpeace Norway, said the name change would not be sufficient to improve Statoil's image as long as the firm was exploring in vulnerable areas such as the Arctic or the Great Australian Bight.
Recommended Reading
Pembina Pipeline Enters Ethane-Supply Agreement, Slow Walks LNG Project
2024-02-26 - Canadian midstream company Pembina Pipeline also said it would hold off on new LNG terminal decision in a fourth quarter earnings call.
Williams Beats 2023 Expectations, Touts Natgas Infrastructure Additions
2024-02-14 - Williams to continue developing natural gas infrastructure in 2024 with growth capex expected to top $1.45 billion.
Canadian Railway Companies Brace for Strike
2024-04-25 - A service disruption caused by a strike in May could delay freight deliveries of petrochemicals.
TC Energy’s Keystone Back Online After Temporary Service Halt
2024-03-10 - As Canada’s pipeline network runs full, producers are anxious for the Trans Mountain Expansion to come online.
Enbridge Announces $500MM Investment in Gulf Coast Facilities
2024-03-06 - Enbridge’s 2024 budget will go primarily towards crude export and storage, advancing plans that see continued growth in power generated by natural gas.